Dear Gerard, I was surprised to get your e-mail. I really don't wish my correspondence to be made public. It was a private response to your query. I try to respond to every query I get, even though it takes up an enormous amount of time--time that might otherwise be spent on the writers I already represent. If my replies to queries are to be made public, I'd prefer not to reply at all; but I would hate to doing that. That notwithstanding, I would not mind making a statement about what I look for and/or how I work. Sincerely, Philip
Dear Phillip: I'm a little unclear about my free speech rights to publish responses to my work vis-a-vis the responders rights to privacy and copyrights. I'm winging this thing. I work as hard as you do and am just as conscientious. This Internet stuff has a lot of gray areas. I'm sure it'll sort itself out. Poke around in the site when (if ever) you have time. It might be a new art form. I'm sure I'll get in a little trouble along the way, but I'd really prefer not to. I think it's a useful tool and a candid overview of what it's like to be a writer, an agent, an editor and a publisher all at the same time. I no doubt have my biases, but I have ethical standards, as well. So do agents, editors and publishers on an individual basis. Yours seem pretty high. So, I think, are mine. Say anything you want. How THIS all came about is explained here in the About this Directory section. G.
Dear Gerard, Here is an elaboration of my situation: I'm trying to not take on new projects. I'm a one-man office with a disproportionately long list of clients. And I am usually months behind in my reading. I do read and respond to queries, however, and I am always tempted to ask to see a proposal or manuscript that intrigues me. But it's rare that I have the proper amount of time to devote to a new project, and I am constantly disappointed that I can't be of help. Agents really do get over-committed and not asking to see a writer's manuscript/proposal is not a reflection on the writer's work...not a rejection. Most writers (to my mind) can't conceive of the fact that any given agent can't take on one more exciting book. But when taking the time to consider a new book project takes time away from something I should be doing for a client, then I am not doing my job properly. Best, Philip Spitzer
Dear Philip: Personally, I do understand that, but I think it will be helpful to others to hear it from a guy with your integrity and obvious affection for the work you do and the writers you represent. Thanks again. G.
|